Kyle Pitts Sr. or Sam LaPorta: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Pitts' workload offsets LaPorta's better scoring environment

Start either, with Pitts' secure role and LaPorta's stronger game environment pulling in opposite directions. Pitts' target-heavy usage gives him a steadier path to relevance despite Atlanta's modest scoring outlook, while LaPorta has the better touchdown setup but carries the only meaningful availability risk. Detroit's expected safety reinforcements also slightly temper LaPorta's matchup appeal (ESPN 2026-09-02).

What flips it: A late downgrade for LaPorta.

Sources: ESPN · Sep 2, 2026

AI editor

Kyle Pitts Sr.

Kyle Pitts Sr.

TE7ATLvs PIT

Projected Points

Start· medium
Sam LaPorta

Sam LaPorta

TE6DETvs NO

Projected Points

Start· medium

Why Kyle Pitts Sr.

Start· medium

TE1 and vertical seam threat. Rare size-speed mismatch profile with high-volume target share in the passing game.

TE7 with an 88% snap share and 23% target share — that volume plays in any 12-team PPR lineup, even in a modest 19.8-point team total.

  • Pitts' target concentration gives him a dependable floor that does not require Atlanta to score often.
  • His clean availability matters at tight end, where a late absence can erase an otherwise favorable play.

The call

  • A 23% target share at tight end is elite-tier usage, and the 88% snap rate means Pitts is on the field for every situational package — that floor alone clears replacement level at a thin position.
  • Consensus has him TE7 at 10.4 projected points; you are not finding a better option on the waiver wire in a 12-team league.
  • The DvP composite lists Pittsburgh 27 of 32 (32 = softest), but it carries a 0-game sample and 0.00 confidence, so treat it as neutral rather than a bonus.
  • The real drag is the 19.8 implied team total with a 3.0-point spread — a low-scoring script caps the ceiling, but the target volume protects the floor.

Why Sam LaPorta

Start· medium

TE1 and pass-catching mismatch. Reliable seam and intermediate target when healthy.

TE6 with a 91% snap share and 17% target share on a 27.8-point implied total — start him if the questionable tag clears.

  • LaPorta's scoring environment offers the clearer route to a touchdown and a ceiling game.
  • The questionable tag is the key concern, while returning Lions safeties add resistance (ESPN 2026-09-02).

The call

  • 11.0 projected points and a TE6 consensus rank put LaPorta well above replacement at a thin position; that's a lineup lock in a 12-team PPR when he's active.
  • Role is bulletproof: 91% snap share and a 17% target share over nine games make him the clear pass-game centerpiece at tight end.
  • Detroit's 27.8 implied total as a 7-point favorite means volume and red-zone looks even if the game script tilts run-heavy late.
  • The only real wrinkle is the questionable designation and a New Orleans DvP that sits 13 of 32 — but that matchup grade carries a 0-game sample and 0.00 confidence, so it shouldn't move the needle. Confirm his status pregame.

Latest on LaPorta

Lions safeties Branch, Joseph expected to return after PUP stints

Lions starting safeties Brian Branch (Achilles) and Kerby Joseph (knee), who will both miss the first four games of the season, are expected to return at some point, according to GM Brad Holmes

ESPN · Sep 2, 2026

Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.

Head-to-head stats

MetricKyle Pitts Sr.Sam LaPorta
Projected points
Consensus rankTE7TE6
Opponent vs positionPIT · 27 of 320-game sampleNO · 13 of 320-game sample
Receptions29 of 3214 of 32
Receiving Yards28 of 3214 of 32
Receiving TDs26 of 329 of 32
Targets28 of 3218 of 32
Anytime TD26 of 329 of 32
Target share23%(2025)17%(2025)
Reception share27%(2025)19%(2025)
Implied total · spread19.8+3.027.8-7.0
Depth chartTE1TE1
Snap share88%(2025)91%(2025)
Injury designationQ

Signal breakdown

  • 10.4 vs 11.0 projected PPR pointsSam LaPorta +
  • Rank 7 vs 6Sam LaPorta +
  • Opponent DvP rank 27 vs 13 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 19.8 vs 27.8 team pointsSam LaPorta +
  • no designation vs QKyle Pitts Sr. +
  • 88% vs 91% snap shareSam LaPorta +

Compare different players

Week 1244 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.