Mark Andrews or T.J. Hockenson: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Start Andrews — the game script and consensus rank edges are too wide to ignore.

Mark Andrews plays in the better game script (26.5 implied team points to 21.5) and is the higher consensus play (TE11 to TE15). Hockenson's edge is snap share, 78% to 62%. The gap is comfortable.

Mark Andrews

Mark Andrews

TE11BALvs IND

Projected Points

Start· medium
T.J. Hockenson

T.J. Hockenson

TE15MINvs GB

Projected Points

Start· medium

Why Mark Andrews

Start· medium

TE1 and red-zone mismatch. Veteran seam-stretcher with strong hands and quarterback rapport.

TE11 with a 17% target share in a 26.5-point implied offense — red-zone role and favorable game script make him a fine TE1 play.

  • IND ranks 20 of 32 against TEs (a middle-of-the-road matchup, 0-game sample).
  • Vegas implies 26.5 team points as 3.5-point favorites.
  • Listed TE on the latest depth chart with a 62% snap share in 2025.

The call

  • A 17% target share on 62% of snaps is a genuine TE1 workload, and Andrews' value is concentrated near the goal line, where Baltimore's 26.5 implied total gives him multiple scoring looks.
  • Vegas has the Ravens as 3.5-point favorites with a healthy team total — the neutral-to-positive script keeps the offense balanced instead of pass-chasing away from the tight end.
  • The Colts grade 20 of 32 vs the position, a mild edge, but the 0-game sample means it shouldn't move the needle either way.
  • Risk is the usual Andrews boom-bust: 10.1 projected points is TE11 territory, so a touchdown-less afternoon leaves him near replacement level — you're starting him for the ceiling.

Why T.J. Hockenson

Start· medium

TE1 and primary middle-of-field target. Route-savvy seam threat with high-volume usage when healthy.

78% snap share and a 16% target share keep Hockenson a volume-driven TE1/2; 9.2 projected points clears the streaming bar in a one-score game.

  • GB ranks 12 of 32 against TEs (a middle-of-the-road matchup, 0-game sample).
  • Vegas implies 21.5 team points as 1.5-point underdogs.
  • Listed TE on the latest depth chart with a 78% snap share in 2025.

The call

  • Role is locked in — 78% of snaps and a 16% target share over 15 games means he's a primary read regardless of matchup.
  • A 1.5-point spread and 21.5 implied team total point to a competitive script where Minnesota keeps throwing rather than grinding out a lead.
  • The GB matchup grades 12 of 32 (tougher half), and the TE15 consensus rank means this is a floor play, not a ceiling one — but 9.2 PPR points beats a typical replacement TE.
  • Only real risk is touchdown dependency; if you're holding a top-10 TE with a softer draw, that's the swap.

Head-to-head stats

MetricMark AndrewsT.J. Hockenson
Projected points
Consensus rankTE11TE15
Opponent vs positionIND · 20 of 320-game sampleGB · 12 of 320-game sample
Receptions25 of 3219 of 32
Receiving Yards31 of 326 of 32
Receiving TDs9 of 329 of 32
Targets24 of 3219 of 32
Anytime TD9 of 329 of 32
Target share17%(2025)16%(2025)
Reception share17%(2025)19%(2025)
Implied total · spread26.5-3.521.5+1.5
Depth chartTE1TE1
Snap share62%(2025)78%(2025)

Signal breakdown

  • 10.1 vs 9.2 projected PPR pointsMark Andrews +
  • Rank 11 vs 15Mark Andrews +
  • Opponent DvP rank 20 vs 12 (32 = softest)even
  • Implied 26.5 vs 21.5 team pointsMark Andrews +
  • No injury designationseven
  • 62% vs 78% snap shareT.J. Hockenson +

Compare different players

Week 1244 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse this week’s NFL games or NFL player props.