Jake Elliott or Will Reichard: Who Should You Start?

2026 Week 1 · deterministic head-to-head · Verdicts based on PPR scoring.

Elliott's game script vs. Reichard's accuracy: pick your kicker flavor

Elliott plays behind a 5.5-point favorite with a 26.0 implied total, the best game-script combo of the two, and that floor of extra points alone nearly matches Reichard's whole scoring line. But Philadelphia's efficiency cuts against him here — an offense that stalls short of the end zone less often means fewer field-goal tries, and his 74% accuracy with just three 50-plus makes all year is thin insurance if the trip inside the 20 doesn't come. Reichard get more red-zone stalls to work with and is drilling kicks at a 94% clip with nine 50-plus makes and a 62-yard long, all from a dome with zero weather variance — the swing skill is real even if the touchdown-conversion role in Minnesota (an underdog, lower implied total) caps his upside. Neither offense projects to blow the roof off, so this comes down to whether you trust Philly's volume or Minnesota's leg.

What flips it: A material uptick in Philadelphia's red-zone stall rate, or a weather scare that dents Elliott's outdoor tries.

AI editor

Jake Elliott

Jake Elliott

K12PHIvs WSH

Projected Points

Start· medium
Will Reichard

Will Reichard

K12MINvs GB

Projected Points

Toss-Up

Why Jake Elliott

Start· medium

Veteran starting K with big-leg range. Proven in high-leverage postseason kicks.

26.0 implied team total and a 5.5-point favorite role give Elliott a 3.0-XP floor plus 1.9 FG tries — enough volume despite the K20 tag.

  • Favorite role behind a 26.0 implied total gives him the highest extra-point ceiling of the two.
  • An efficient Eagles offense that rarely stalls cuts into his own field-goal chance volume.

The call

  • Philadelphia's 26.0 implied total is the key input: 3.0 projected extra points give Elliott a floor most K20-ranked kickers don't have, and 1.9 attempts add the upside.
  • Only 0.8 red-zone stalls per game means this offense finishes drives rather than settling for field goals — that caps attempt volume but converts into the XP floor instead.
  • Risk factors are real: 74% accuracy (20/27) is unimpressive and the K20 consensus rank says the market sees him as a fringe starter, so a shootout that stalls could leave 5-6 points.
  • He's locked in as PK1 with no injury designation, and the open roof has no forecast yet — recheck weather before locking, since wind is the one thing that would flip this to a sit.

Why Will Reichard

Toss-Up

Starting K with strong leg. Handles kickoffs and long-range attempts.

Toss-up — K12 by consensus, projects K14 this week: kicks indoors, and 1.3 red-zone stalls a game.

  • More red-zone stalls for his offense mean more field-goal look opportunities despite a lower point total.
  • His 94% accuracy and 62-yard long make him a live long-range weapon in a stall-prone dome game.

Head-to-head stats

MetricJake ElliottWill Reichard
Projected points
Consensus rankK12K12
Projected FG attempts1.92.1
Red-zone stalls / game0.8(2025)1.3(2025)
Kicking conditionsIndoors, no weather risk
Implied total · spread26.0-5.521.5+1.5
Field-goal %74.1%(2025)94.3%(2025)
Depth chartK1K1
Start/Sit record00+1 toss-up

Signal breakdown

  • 8.5 vs 8.4 projected PPR pointsJake Elliott +
  • Rank 12 vs 12Will Reichard +
  • 1.9 vs 2.1 projected attemptsWill Reichard +
  • 0.8 vs 1.3 red-zone stalls per gameWill Reichard +
  • Kicking weathereven
  • Implied 26.0 vs 21.5 team pointsJake Elliott +
  • No injury designationseven

Compare different players

Week 1244 players
Player A
vs
Player B

Every fantasy-relevant player this week — search or filter by position.

This week’s toughest calls

Want full matchup analysis & AI picks? →

Save your roster and get a Start, Sit, or Toss-Up call on every player, every week — plus prop pages, matchup data, and AI-powered NFL analysis.

Add to My Team — free

Or browse NFL player props or this week’s Start/Sit board.