Start Brian Thomas Jr. over Jordan Addison — Week 1 Start/Sit Verdict

Start Thomas — the availability and game script edges are too wide to ignore.

Brian Thomas Jr. is the healthier side of this call (Addison carries a Questionable tag) and plays in the better game script (24.0 implied team points to 21.5). Addison's edge is snap share, 85% to 78%. The gap is comfortable.

Brian Thomas Jr.

WR42JAXvs CLE

7.08.510.1 Projected Points

Start· medium

Jordan Addison

WR44MINvs GB

6.48.29.9 Projected Points

Toss-Up· medium

Why Brian Thomas Jr.

Start· medium

WR1 and primary vertical threat. Long-striding field-stretcher with contested-catch radius; bounce-back candidate after inefficient season.

20% target share and 78% snaps make him Jacksonville's clear No. 1 option; Cleveland's tough coverage caps the ceiling but not the volume.

CLE ranks 10 of 32 against WRs (one of the tougher matchups, 0-game sample).
Vegas implies 24.0 team points as 7.5-point favorites.
Listed WR on the latest depth chart with a 78% snap share in 2025.

The call

Locked-in role: 78% snap share and a 20% target share over 14 games — that's alpha-receiver usage, and volume is what plays in PPR.
Matchup is the drag: Cleveland grades 10 of 32 in DvP composite (32 = softest), so this is a tougher-than-average coverage draw and the 10.1-point projection reflects it.
Game script is a mild negative — Jacksonville is favored by 7.5 with a 24.0 implied total, which can turn into a run-leaning fourth quarter, but the early-down target volume is still there.
No injury designation and no competing role change; WR40 on the consensus board is flex-viable, and his usage floor beats a typical replacement.

Why Jordan Addison

Toss-Up· medium

WR2 and vertical field-stretcher. Slight-framed separator with deep-ball tracking and red-zone production.

85% snaps and a 21% target share give a real floor, but 9.9 projected points and a WR45 tag make him a pure replacement-level flex vs GB.

Carries a Questionable tag — usually plays, but monitor the final report.
GB ranks 17 of 32 against WRs (a middle-of-the-road matchup, 0-game sample).
Vegas implies 21.5 team points as 1.5-point underdogs.
Listed WR-2 on the latest depth chart with a 85% snap share in 2025.

The call

The role is not the problem: 85% snap share and a 21% target share over 14 games make Addison a locked-in WR2 who gets fed regardless of script.
The matchup is neutral at best — Green Bay grades 17 of 32 in the DvP composite, and that number carries a 0-game sample with 0.00 confidence, so there's no edge to bank on.
A 21.5 implied team total with a 1.5-point spread points to a tight, moderate-scoring game — enough passing volume to matter, not enough to project a spike week.
Tiebreaker: start him if your alternative is a sub-15% target-share flyer; sit him if you have a WR attached to a higher implied total or a genuinely soft coverage matchup.

Latest on Addison

2026 Minnesota Vikings training camp: Latest intel, updates

Catch up on our updates from Vikings training camp, including intel on QBs, position battles and potential breakouts.

ESPN · Aug 26, 2026

Reported by the sources listed — not independently verified.

Head-to-head stats

Metric	Brian Thomas Jr.	Jordan Addison
Projected points	7.08.510.1	6.48.29.9
Consensus rank	WR42	WR44
Opponent vs position	CLE · 10 of 320-game sample	GB · 17 of 320-game sample
Receptions	3 of 32	14 of 32
Receiving Yards	1 of 32	14 of 32
Receiving TDs	22 of 32	27 of 32
Targets	3 of 32	10 of 32
Anytime TD	22 of 32	22 of 32
Target share	20%(2025)	21%(2025)
Reception share	17%(2025)	17%(2025)
Implied total · spread	24.0-7.5	21.5+1.5
Depth chart	WR1	WR2
Snap share	78%(2025)	85%(2025)
Injury designation	—	Questionable
Start/Sit record	—	0–0+1 toss-up